Add notes about storage redundancy
This commit is contained in:
parent
69af0dc406
commit
d2a6864a3b
@ -17,4 +17,33 @@ data corruption
|
||||
|
||||
### Current State
|
||||
|
||||
All primary data is stored
|
||||
All primary data is stored on a single 8TB drive array in hardware RAID 5. The
|
||||
array is comprised of four Western Digital Red NAS drives, each with a 3TB
|
||||
capacity. The array is fault tolerant, but not redundant. Secondary data is
|
||||
stored in one of three places: the primary array, a secondary drive array, or
|
||||
the 256GB boot drive of a single server.
|
||||
|
||||
The secondary array is 470GB aggregate, comprised of four HST Travelstar 10K
|
||||
SAS drives, also in hardware RAID 5. The boot drive of the server is a consumer
|
||||
grade SSD. None of these systems are backed up or redundant.
|
||||
|
||||
Primary data includes personal data including books, projects, documents,
|
||||
documentation, photos, etc. Secondary data is application configuration
|
||||
information and deployed hosting systems.
|
||||
|
||||
In addition to the primary and secondary data, there is the tertiary data of
|
||||
a media collection (movies, TV, etc). Tertiary data is stored on the primary
|
||||
drive array, only because there is nowhere else with enough capacity to store
|
||||
it.
|
||||
|
||||
### Desired State
|
||||
|
||||
Data should be more efficiently segregated by priority tier. The two drive
|
||||
arrays should be split up into two arrays each: a pair of 3TB arrays using the
|
||||
WD Red's and a pair of 146GB array's using the Travelstars. Each pair of arrays
|
||||
should be installed into the two [Dell R410's](../hardware/poweredge-r410.md).
|
||||
Secondary data exists on the 146GB arrays on each server and is routinely
|
||||
backed up to the 3TB arrays on the same server.
|
||||
|
||||
Primary data should be cloned on both of the 3TB arrays. Primary data should
|
||||
be backed up externally to a third server.
|
||||
|
Loading…
Reference in New Issue
Block a user